Thank you. We will be in touch shortly.

Quick Call
Request Quick Call

Thank you. We will be in touch shortly.


Third-Party Risk Management from a Geo-Economic Perspective

Date posted: Aug 30, 2022
Estimated read: 3 min
Author: David Loseby
Topics: Risk Management

We are witnessing unprecedented complexities in supply chains influenced by politically motivated policies and legislation, and the impact on organizations will be both direct and indirect. It is imperative for procurement and supply chain management to accept and plan for new forms of risk in global supply chains for both public and private sectors.

5 Dynamic Factors of TPRM

Regarding geo-economic risks, third-party risk management (TPRM) would benefit from the unification of terms so risk management frameworks can be better aligned with current events. The post pandemic economy will likely be the new normal for the foreseeable future. Today’s recommended approach to TPRM can be broken down into 5 dynamic factors:

1.  Trade & Export Controls - Controlling or blocking foreign investment in critical infrastructure or technologies and delisting companies such as the United States’ actions against Chinese companies.

2. Investment Screening Mechanisms - Regulating the export of technologies that have multiple use potential.

3.  Data Localization Measures – Incentives and legislation aimed at redesigning and reshoring supply chain activity such as the recent US legislation that has done this through Executive Order 14005: Ensuring the Future Is Made in All of America by All of America's Workers.

4.  Sanctions – Discourage universities and research centers from hosting students from other countries to prevent the dissemination of knowledge considered strategic.

5.  Subsidies – Investments in disruptive technologies and targeted research and development.

Questions to Ask

Much of this activity has been driven by concern about the level of hyper-connectivity through complex global supply chains and increased threats from cyber security. For procurement and supply chain management (P&SCM), establishing a more agile set of questions is needed such as the following:

  • Do you have exclusive or shared IPR with a specific list of countries?

  • Do you license the use and/or production of multipurpose technologies to a specific list of countries?

  • Are you reliant on state investment for specific aspects of R&D?

  • Are obligations disclosed when any of the 5 dynamic factors listed above are triggered?

  • Are notifications being distributed immediately upon infringements of IPR or technology use or duplication by specific countries?

  • Where is data hosted and what cloud platforms are being used?

  • Are there any “extra-territorial” sanctions such as USA organizations whereby citizens would be prohibited from dealing with a French bank giving a loan to an Iranian company, even if the loan were legal under French law?

  • Can provide evidence and validate the levels of traceability and transparency in key suppliers?

Changes will continue as we can see from China seeking to create a parallel financial infrastructure to counter the US controlled SWIFT system and European system INSTEX, with the China International Payment System (CIPS) using the Yuan as a currency standard. Global technical standards are currently being challenged to make them less Western centric to level the trading opportunities. Taking the complexity out of complex global supply chains will not be quick and easy, so effective TPRM is here for the foreseeable future.


Sources for further reading:

Henrique Choer Moraes and Mikael Wigell, ‘The Emergence of Strategic Capi­talism: Geoeconomics, Corporate Statecraft and the Repurposing of the Global Economy’, FIIA Working Paper 117 (2020),

For a discussion, see Christian O. Fjäder, ‘Interdependence as Dependence: Eco­nomic Security in the Age of Global Interconnectedness’, in Mikael Wigell, Sören Scholvin and Mika Aaltola (eds.), Geo-economics and Power Politics in the 21st Century: The Revival of Economic Statecraft (London: Routledge, 2018).

Mikael Wigell, Harri Mikkola and Tapio Juntunen, ‘Best Practices in the Whole-of-Society Approach in Countering Hybrid Treats’, INGE European Par­liament Study (Brussels: European Union, 2021),

Juan C. Zarate, Treasury’s War: The Unleashing of a New Era of Financial War­fare (Philadelphia: Public Affairs, 2015), p. xi.

Geofrey Gertz and Miles R. Evers, ‘Geoeconomic competition: Will state capital­ism win?’, The Washington Quarterly 43, 2 (2020), p. 117.

Made in China 2025 strategy and plan:

Scanmarket Briefing notes – Ukraine-Russin conflict x 2

David Loseby

About the author

David Loseby

With over 30 years’ experience at senior executive/director level driving value and change through procurement, organisational transformation and change management, my background spans a variety of roles with significant global experience and responsibilities in both private and public sectors (pharmaceuticals, banking, FMCG, manufacturing, consulting, retail, aerospace & defence, venture capital, healthcare (NHS) & local Government. Formerly Group CPO for Rolls Royce, I was the principal architect behind the behavioural science led approach to adoption of a new digital platform.

See authors posts
Recent blogs
How Scanmarket Helped Leaders Romans Group Transform Their Operations

How Scanmarket Helped Leaders Romans Group Transform Their Operations

Find out how Leaders Romans Group executed their digitalization plan successfully by partnering with Scanmarket.

Read article  
How eAuctions are Boosting Procurement Teams Performance and Productivity

How eAuctions are Boosting Procurement Teams Performance and Productivity

eAuctions are now key to boost the performance and productivity of procurement teams.

Read article  
The Impact of Trade Policies on Global Strategic Sourcing

The Impact of Trade Policies on Global Strategic Sourcing

There is a complex and multifaceted relationship between Trade Policies and Strategic Sourcing.

Read article